🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard females from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative factions have contended that its focus on gender equality weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread protest both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for additional consideration if he has objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "considering state and legal factors, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar debates in other EU countries