🔗 Share this article

Based on a recent examination, numerous of people with histories in the petroleum field have been placed within the existing administration, featuring above 40 who earlier worked personally for oil firms.

Overview of the Study

The report analyzed the profiles of candidates and appointees working in the executive branch and multiple national agencies responsible for climate regulation. These include important organizations like the environmental agency, the Department of the Interior, and the Department of Energy.

Broader Administrative Context

The analysis emerges amid persistent efforts to roll back energy policies and alternative energy supports. For example, new acts have unlocked extensive sections of government territory for extraction and eliminated funding for clean energy.

Amid the flood of bad actions that have occurred on the climate side... it’s important to educate the people that these are not just steps from the amorphous, huge thing that is the administration writ large, commented a analyst involved in the study. It is frequently individual actors with ties to particular powerful groups that are implementing this harmful deregulatory plan.

Major Findings

Authors identified 111 personnel whom they classified as energy sector veterans and alternative energy adversaries. That includes 43 officials who were personally working by coal companies. Included in them are prominent senior officials like the head of energy, who formerly served as CEO of a oil extraction company.

This group additionally features lower-profile government staff. For example, the department overseeing clean technology is led by a former gas leader. Likewise, a senior energy advisor in the administration has occupied top-level positions at large petroleum companies.

Other Ties

An additional 12 appointees have ties to fossil fuel-funded conservative thinktanks. These encompass ex- staff and researchers of groups that have vigorously resisted clean power and championed the use of conventional sources.

A total of 29 additional staff are previous business leaders from manufacturing fields whose operations are intimately connected to fossil fuels. Further individuals have relationships with energy firms that distribute traditional energy or public leaders who have pushed pro-coal agendas.

Agency Focus

Researchers identified that 32 personnel at the interior agency by themselves have links to extractive industries, establishing it as the most affected national body. That features the secretary of the agency, who has long accepted industry funding and acted as a conduit between oil and gas industry contributors and the government.

Campaign Funding

Energy contributors provided sizable funds to the presidential operation and swearing-in. After assuming power, the administration has not only implemented industry-friendly rules but also crafted tax breaks and exceptions that favor the industry.

Qualifications Questions

In addition to oil-tied candidates, the analysts found multiple government higher-ups who were selected to powerful jobs with little or no pertinent experience.

Those people may not be tied to fossil fuels so closely, but their lack of expertise is dangerous, remarked a co-author. It is plausible to think they will be easily influenced, or easy marks, for the energy sector’s plans.

As an example, the nominee to lead the EPA’s office of chief legal officer has limited court history, having not ever handled a lawsuit to verdict, never taken a testimony, and not filed a motion.

In an additional instance, a executive assistant dealing on energy policy moved to the role after being employed in positions separate to the industry, with no apparent specific field or regulatory experience.

Administration Statement

A spokesperson for the White House rejected the analysis, stating that the leadership’s personnel are extremely capable to execute on the people’s instruction to expand domestic energy output.

Previous and Current Backdrop

The administration enacted a massive array of anti-environmental actions during its first period. In its second tenure, prepared with pro-business agendas, it has spearheaded a far broader and stricter dismantling on climate rules and renewable energy.

There’s no embarrassment, stated one researcher. Officials are proud and prepared to go out there and tout the fact that they are doing favors for the energy industry, extractive industry, the coal industry.